Crime and Punishment - Raskolnikovs Extraordinary Man Theory :: Dostoevsky Crime and Punishment

discourtesy and Punishment - Raskolnikovs Extraordinary Man Theory In the novel, curse and Punishment, the principle character, Raskolnikov, has unknowingly published a collection of his thoughts on crime and punishment via an article entitled On Crime. Porfiry, who is trying to link Raskolnikov to a murder, has exposed this article, read it, and tells Raskolnikov that he is very interested in learning about his ideas. Porfiry brings Raskolnikov into this conversation primarily to find out more about Raskolnikovs possible interestingness in the crime. Raskolnikov decides to take him up on the challenge of discussing his theory, and embarks into a large discussion of his philosophy of man. Raskolnikov holds that by a law of nature men rent been somewhat arbitrarily divided into two groups--ordinary and extraordinary. Raskolnikov believe that the duty and vocation of the first group is to be servile, the material out of which the world and society is to be formed. The first grou p are the commonwealth of the present, the now. The second group, those who are extraordinary, are a step above the chemical formula, ordinary curs. They urinate the ability to overstep popular bounds and transgress the rights of those who are simply ordinary. They are the prime movers--they have a right to transcend normal societal strictures to accomplish those things they have goaded are valid in their conscience. Extraordinary men are the prime movers. He cites such extraordinary men as unfermentedton, Mahomet, and Napoleon. He tells us that north had the right to kill hundreds of men if need be in order to bring to the world knowledge of his findings. Napoleon and other leaders created a clean word. They overturned ancient laws and created new ones. They had the right to uphold their new ideal, even if it meant killing innocent men defending the ancient law. The first class of passel preserve and people the world, the second move the world and lead it to its goal. Des pite these tremendous differences in his theory, and the obvious superiority that the extraordinary people are afforded, Raskolnikov maintains that some(prenominal) classes have an equal right to exist. This is interesting, and anyone who sees tremendous problems with this theory must realize this very important point-- some(prenominal) classes of men and women are necessary to understand the true intend of Raskolnikovs theory. Without the extraordinary branch of men, without their ability and moral obligation to overstep the bounds of society at certain times, the history of the world would never have progressed to the republic that we find ourselves now.Crime and Punishment - Raskolnikovs Extraordinary Man Theory Dostoevsky Crime and PunishmentCrime and Punishment - Raskolnikovs Extraordinary Man Theory In the novel, Crime and Punishment, the principle character, Raskolnikov, has unknowingly published a collection of his thoughts on crime and punishment via an article ent itled On Crime. Porfiry, who is trying to link Raskolnikov to a murder, has uncovered this article, read it, and tells Raskolnikov that he is very interested in learning about his ideas. Porfiry brings Raskolnikov into this conversation primarily to find out more about Raskolnikovs possible date in the crime. Raskolnikov decides to take him up on the challenge of discussing his theory, and embarks into a large discussion of his philosophy of man. Raskolnikov holds that by a law of nature men have been somewhat arbitrarily divided into two groups--ordinary and extraordinary. Raskolnikov believe that the duty and vocation of the first group is to be servile, the material out of which the world and society is to be formed. The first group are the people of the present, the now. The second group, those who are extraordinary, are a step above the normal, ordinary curs. They have the ability to overstep normal bounds and transgress the rights of those who are simply ordinary. They are t he prime movers--they have a right to transcend normal societal strictures to accomplish those things they have fixed are valid in their conscience. Extraordinary men are the prime movers. He cites such extraordinary men as Newton, Mahomet, and Napoleon. He tells us that Newton had the right to kill hundreds of men if need be in order to bring to the world knowledge of his findings. Napoleon and other leaders created a new word. They overturned ancient laws and created new ones. They had the right to uphold their new ideal, even if it meant killing innocent men defending the ancient law. The first class of people preserve and people the world, the second move the world and lead it to its goal. Despite these tremendous differences in his theory, and the obvious superiority that the extraordinary people are afforded, Raskolnikov maintains that both classes have an equal right to exist. This is interesting, and anyone who sees tremendous problems with this theory must realize this ver y important point--both classes of men and women are necessary to understand the true marrow of Raskolnikovs theory. Without the extraordinary branch of men, without their ability and moral obligation to overstep the bounds of society at certain times, the history of the world would never have progressed to the soil that we find ourselves now.